Why Meat Consumption Will Reduce In Future
A recent BBC comedy by Simon Amstell imagines a life in 2067 in which society goes vegan and people flock to support groups to come to terms with their flesh-consuming past. Although it seems strange to many viewers, a philosopher at Oxford University says there is a serious ethical argument for forgoing meat. This is a somewhat delicate contribution to write, because in order to appreciate the good cuts of meat, we need to talk about the sustainable lifestyle issues associated with it.
The beef-chicken conversation shows how meat consumption is affecting the planet. Meat is one of the most popular foods of all, and in order to create a better world. According to a study by Betway Casino consumers will be persuaded to depart from meat, not only in order to switch to another category of meat, but also in order to weigh up the various ecological and moral disasters that meat causes.
Why giving up meat will be best for future
In fact, reducing meat consumption is a great thing if ethical concerns about animal welfare are set aside and the environmental impact is focused. Removing meat and animal products from the diet will have a positive impact on the ecological footprint, even if it is not as large as some people would imagine. Even if one does not want to live vegan or vegetarian, a reduced meat consumption can have a very positive effect.
Eating meat or animal products has a negative impact on the environment. If you follow a vegan or vegetarian diet, reducing your environmental impact is great. No matter what lifestyle you have, from your mum on the third day with dry shampoo, to the girl at the gym logging her macros, to the busy commuter and the pensioner on the road: take it from me, if you want to eat meat, do it blamelessly and do it right.
If you eat a lot of beef, start with lean chicken, turkey or pork. For beef, use a combination of ground beef and ground turkey in your next batch of chili.
How meat consumption is affecting the environment
As you probably read, raising meat for food, for example, requires a lot of water. Estimates vary, but the consensus is that the water with which animals can clean, harvest and feed themselves is too large to consume and that it takes several thousand liters of water to produce a kilogram of deboned beef. Returning to the question at hand, if we were to produce enough meat to destroy the planet, one solution put forward by large carnivores such as the Americans and others would be to halve that quantity. Most meat, dairy products and eggs are produced in a way that ignores animal welfare and does not provide enough space for movement, contact with other animals or access to nature. In short, industrial agriculture causes animals to suffer without good justification.
Challenges ahead
As developing countries like China, India and Russia become more middle-class, they will look for more luxury products like meat and other animal products like cheese and dairy. Vegetable meat products will be more difficult to distinguish from the original, while they will have a lower carbon footprint and have no impact on animals. Meat consumption will decrease in industrialized countries, but global consumption will increase because consumers are not willing to reduce their meat consumption, especially in developing countries.
